|
11 November 2002 13:46 by Petteri "dRD" Pyyny
| 6 comments
In a rather surprising move, DVD Forum (the authority which controls the development of the DVD standards), has chosen a technology by NEC and Toshiba to work as a blueprint for next generation blue-laser DVDs.
This is big setback for a Blu-Ray Consortium, a group of nine big consumer electronic companies, who launched their blue-laser specs earlier this year hoping that by uniting their forces they could avoid current situation where markets have two competing red-laser technologies, the "minus" and the "plus" formats. But now it seems that this will be exactly the same story with blue-laser recordable standards as well.
NEC-Toshiba model users 0.6mm cover layer disk system, similiar to those used currently in red-laser DVD discs, while Blu-Ray uses 0.1mm cover layer. Blu-Ray can store upto 27GB of data per side, but the NEC-Toshiba disc can hold only appx. 20GB per side.
Source: EETimes
Permalink to this article
| |
Related articles:
Blu-Ray disc made out of paper released (15 April 2004)
New DVD-Video specs released -- a disappointment (27 October 2003)
Breakthrough in Blu-Ray technology (18 April 2003)
Sanyo develops blue-violet laser -- 54GB per disc side (28 March 2003)
Sony unveils first Blu-ray recorder (3 March 2003)
Blu-Ray licensing begins on Monday (13 February 2003)
Sand Video to provide a H.264 chip (13 January 2003)
First Blu-Ray laser controllers available (11 September 2002)
NEC and Toshiba introduce another blue-laser DVD technology (26 August 2002)
Sanyo to mass-produce blue-laser parts (10 August 2002)
Next generation DVDs to use MPEG-4 (2 March 2002)
Manufacturers agree to create uniform blue-laser DVD standard (19 February 2002)
Matsushita unveils 50GB DVDs (15 October 2001)
|
|
|
| Discuss this article! |
| 40duece (Newbie) 12 November 2002 9:21 |
|
|
|
| Ghostdog (Senior Member) 13 November 2002 4:53 |
|
|
What do you mean "kewl"? This sucks. OK, so the competition might help frive prices down, but imagine this: You spend 200 dollars on a drive from one of the technology-camps. Then, a year later the other technology takes over and your stuck with a drive you can´t use since no one makes discs for the "old" technolgy.
|
| dRD (I hate titles) 13 November 2002 6:13 |
|
I can already see the situation where DVD formats haven't cleared the standard yet and there are two blue-laser disc formats available. Then you have to pick which writer you buy:
Combo DVD-R/W - Blu-Ray drive
Combo DVD+R/W - NEC/Toshiba drive
Combo DVD-R/W - NEC/Toshiba drive
Combo DVD+R/W - Blu-Ray drive
|
| Bez002 (Inactive) 17 November 2002 22:10 |
|
|
Surely guys, now the decision is made, we Joe public will decide. If Blu-Ray uses a 0.1mm cover layer and if it can store upto 27GB of data per side, then it may well be the better of the two tech. systems. The earlier this knowledge is made known to us "Joe Publics" The greater the chances are of the best system becomming the standard. Won learns from history that the first on the market may well sweep the best away. I am old enough to remember the dezaster of VHS and Betamax!
|
| dRD (I hate titles) 18 November 2002 0:39 |
|
I'm not so sure about the public's ability to choose the format -- or actually, yes, public WILL choose the format, but meanwhile there are millions of people who bought "the wrong one" and will suffer. That wont be the case with current DVD recordable war, because both formats can be read with each other's drives and with existing DVD players, but as these two blue-laser technologies are so different, there's a good change that these will be identical to the Beta/VHS war, where players weren't compatible with each other.
|
| cblanche (Inactive) 22 November 2002 2:35 |
|
|
This is a no brainer, I will always go with the technology that offers me the most bang for my dollars and the most storage. There are nine big consumer companies behind the Blu-Ray technology, that's a lot of muscle. Considering that Toshiba is one of the core groups behind the DVD Forum, the Blu-Ray Consortium probably wanted to put pressure on the DVD Forum to look at technology over favoring one of its members. I want to go with the best technology. Just from the little bit of information given, Blu-Ray seems to be on the leading edge. It will probably be like the -R/RW and +R/RW. The +R/RW is actually closer to the DVD Forum specs for what DVD should be. I would not be surprised if Blu-Ray did the same.
|
|
|
Latest newsLatest news from AfterDawn.com. Flash coming to Windows Mobile, Android 19 Nov, 2008 | 2 comments Hong Kong pirates selling bootleg Blu-rays on DVDs 19 Nov, 2008 | 10 comments Apple adds more DRM to MacBooks 18 Nov, 2008 | 2 comments 14 million active PSN accounts now, says Sony 18 Nov, 2008 | 3 comments Hungry? Order Domino's through TiVo 18 Nov, 2008 | 13 comments Pirate Bay smashes through new milestone 18 Nov, 2008 | 4 comments 70 percent of Finnish youth are 'criminal' pirates 17 Nov, 2008 | 20 comments Canadian convicted of filming in movie theater 17 Nov, 2008 | 18 comments HDTV market penetration at all-time high 17 Nov, 2008 | 6 comments Future Shop drops price on Zune 15 Nov, 2008 | 8 comments Xbox 360 to outsell original Xbox 15 Nov, 2008 | 12 comments DSi still selling well in Japan 15 Nov, 2008 | 3 comments
More news... 
Search for headlinesSearch through our news archive. 
Latest threadsRecently updated discussion threads. More... 
Last week's most popular software downloads
Most popular devicesLast week's most popular products in our product comparison service. More products... 
Top linksMost popular links - Blasteroids.com
Download game trailers, demos and more - TorrentReactor.Net
The most active torrents on the web - Digital-Digest
Latest DivX, XviD, DVD, Blu-Ray, HD DVD News - OpenSubtitles.org
download DivX subtitles from the biggest open database - CDRInfo.com
The Hardware Authority - DVDHelp.us
DVD help, tutorials, FAQ, and very popular free help forum! - Torrentreactor.TO
The most active torrents on the web - Ease Audio Converter.
Convert files from MP3, WAV, WMA, OGG, AAC, APE, FLAC, and MP4 to WAV and backwards.

|