Source: HighFidelityReview.com
what a shame. how the hell does the dvd forum expect the dualdisc to compete with sacd? the quality of sacd is FAR FAR FAR better than dvd audio will ever be. the sample rate of dvd audio is 192,000 samples per second. the sample rate of sacd is over 1.4 millions samples per second. hmmm, which one is better?
djscoop - you are incorrect... SACD is a ONE bit system whereas DVD-A is 24 bit. This is why SACD has trouble with frequencies over 8000khz, while DVD-A is clearly more capable of being the best choice for archivists. There is an article (rather lengthy) that fully describes the fidelity mechanics and calculations... I will post back when I find it for you.
yes yes, I know. I've already has a lengthy discussion with several other people over this...it was on this forum... they seem to have disappeared
Sorry - didn't see that... DVD-A really does sound quite close though, to my untrained ear.