The letter goes on with details about laws that are currently enforced in the United States that criminalize the unauthorized recording of movies in theaters using camcorder equipment. "Unfortunately, since the United States has enacted tougher laws and penalties against piracy, including camcording piracy, it seems that much of this illicit business has simply moved north," the letter continued.
The letter claims that Canadian-sourced recordings rose by 24% in 2006 from 2005. Canada was criticized by Fox after it reported that, at one point during 2006, Canadian theaters were the source for nearly 50% of illegal Cam recordings across the globe. Here is an interesting extract from the letter...
A worldwide study commissioned by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) concluded that in 2005 movie piracy cost the Canadian film industry and your government $225 million and $34 million, respectively, in lost revenues.US ambassador David Wilkins also had a say on the subject. "There's a lot of pirating that goes on, a lot of counterfeiting of movies and songs" and "it really does cost the Canadian economy a huge amount every year, estimated to be from some 10 to 30 billion (dollars) per year," he said. The Conservative government in Canada claims that the recording activity is illegal and can carry a fine of up to $1 million and 5 years in prison for commercial distribution.
If Canada does not criminalize illicit camcording, we are afraid that illegal pirating will continue to mushroom in your country. While a new law will not stop the worldwide-problem of film camcording, it will certainly help end this most egregious form of copyright piracy. It is bad enough when artists must compete with pirates to sell their products; it is far worse when pirates steal artists’ creations and then sell them before the artist has even had the chance to recover their costs.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter of utmost importance. If we can be of any assistance to you or your cabinet ministers, please do not hesitate to contact us.
However, Hollywood studios say that a loophole in the law means that it has to be proven that a film is being recorded for mass distribution first.
Source:
Slyck