Google is selling the phone unlocked for $530, or $180 with contract via T-Mobile.
The full teardown results:
Thats all and they have it priced so high unlocked and whats up with not having the multitouch ability?
Originally posted by borhan9:$530 sounds reasonable to you?
Sounds reasonable to me.
Quote:Then buy it with a MasterCard :/Originally posted by borhan9:$530 sounds reasonable to you?
Sounds reasonable to me.
A phone that you won't even be able to get insurance on?
Wow.
That's outrageous! So that's how much of a top of the lone smartphone costs to make and we're forced to pay half a grand for them? An eye opener for sure, assuming these stats are acurate. To that persn on here who said this price sounded fine to them. I hope you were just be sarcastic. IF not, then would you mind enlightening me as well as others on here as to how that is so? To now realize how much profit the manufacturer and phone companies make off of these phones(we have to sign people to contracts in order to subsidize the price of our phones. BS!)about makes me want to throw up. Ought to be f'ing illegal.
don't forget all the engineering time, prototypes, research, programers times & manufacturing of molds for the phone has to be recuped from that remaining money. it is like buying a model warship kit that costs between $30 to $300 dollars. the plastic maybe cost $2 but have to factor in the cad designs, research & mold manufacturing. depending on how complex a mold is & what metal it is made from determines the price of mold from $100k to over a $1 million each.
Originally posted by 5fdpfan:
That's outrageous! So that's how much of a top of the lone smartphone costs to make and we're forced to pay half a grand for them? An eye opener for sure, assuming these stats are acurate. To that persn on here who said this price sounded fine to them. I hope you were just be sarcastic. IF not, then would you mind enlightening me as well as others on here as to how that is so? To now realize how much profit the manufacturer and phone companies make off of these phones(we have to sign people to contracts in order to subsidize the price of our phones. BS!)about makes me want to throw up. Ought to be f'ing illegal.
R and D people R&D!
google (well actually HTC) have probably put millions into this, researching and developing this, $530 is EXTREMELY reasonable.
i wouldnt pay $530 for a phone especially one that cost $174 to make.
Originally posted by shaffaaf:Yeah, no kidding, right!!!
R and D people R&D!
google (well actually HTC) have probably put millions into this, researching and developing this, $530 is EXTREMELY reasonable.
I agree 530 is reasonable. If you look up your cellphone on the website to pay, it's usually around this much, if not more. Look up Iphone 3gs unlock, they go for USD 700 to USD 1,000 each.
Quote:It's "mind boggling" that people think a company that MAKES BILLIONS a year can just charge whatever they want for a damn phone. Sure 500 is fine. But with a contract I want it for 200. Well guess what?! No contract. So. I'll go with the Iphone. The cheaper, more established one. (oh btw, did I mention you can actually use the touch screen on that one?)
Yeah, no kidding, right!!!
I cannot believe that are people who think the net cost of a gadget like this is limited to the cost of the individual parts...is mind boggling... No one just wakes up overnight after dreaming about a super phone, orders the parts on ebay and slaps it together during a lunch break!!!
lol it IS subsidised. bcurrently by tmobile and sson by verizon, and for t-mob its $180. Have you even used the N1 screen to base your opinion?
Originally posted by Rebel11:
It's "mind boggling" that people think a company that MAKES BILLIONS a year can just charge whatever they want for a damn phone. Sure 500 is fine. But with a contract I want it for 200. Well guess what?! No contract. So. I'll go with the Iphone. The cheaper, more established one. (oh btw, did I mention you can actually use the touch screen on that one?)
Quote:You're correct. I've never tried to put together my own smartphone. And despite my feelings about the price it's not like I haven't paid the prmium before or will refuse to do again. That's the way of the land and will never change. I, though apparently in the minority here, found this news a bit hard to take. If there just wasn't as great of a disparity in the sell price and manufacturing cost it wouldn't have bothered me as much, as I would have considered the sell price to be more fair. As it is now, I feel like I'm getting taken to the cleaners for no legitimate reason other than, cause that's just what HTC, Nokia, and others feel like selling it for and so that's what I'll pay. I suppose you and others may have a point when brining up r&d. It's the only logical explaination that makes any sort of sense. On a side note, why would Google choose to disable the phone's multi-touch capabilities? They want to compete directly with the Iphone? Well that's one of the features it boasts and they want to deny Nexus users of that aweomse technology. PuzzlingOriginally posted by 5fdpfan:
That's outrageous! So that's how much of a top of the lone smartphone costs to make and we're forced to pay half a grand for them? An eye opener for sure, assuming these stats are acurate. To that persn on here who said this price sounded fine to them. I hope you were just be sarcastic. IF not, then would you mind enlightening me as well as others on here as to how that is so? To now realize how much profit the manufacturer and phone companies make off of these phones(we have to sign people to contracts in order to subsidize the price of our phones. BS!)about makes me want to throw up. Ought to be f'ing illegal.
Ha, there's a joke right there!
I bet you never had to build anything in your life. If you buy $10.000 worth of materials from a hardware store to build a garage, unless you have a genie or a magic wand, you gotta pay a lot of extra cash do actually get the building up,like design it, maybe some excavation and leveling, maybe someone to pour a slab of concrete for you...and someone to actually do the building.
Puke as much as you want, $500 is more than reasonable. If you don't think so, order the parts online and try to put one together yourself,then you'll see how much someone else's knowledge/time/talent is valued.
I don't know why they disabled the multi-touch on the North American version(it will be available on the the European market; I actually watched the live transmission, I just don't recall their explanation).
Whatever the reason is, I am sure they are aware this is something might turn people off.
Quote:- As per my article, $180 for the Nexus One with TMob contract.
It's "mind boggling" that people think a company that MAKES BILLIONS a year can just charge whatever they want for a damn phone. Sure 500 is fine. But with a contract I want it for 200. Well guess what?! No contract. So. I'll go with the Iphone. The cheaper, more established one. (oh btw, did I mention you can actually use the touch screen on that one?)
Quote:Thanks, DVDBack, more eloquently said than I tried, and in far lesser words:)Quote:- As per my article, $180 for the Nexus One with TMob contract.
It's "mind boggling" that people think a company that MAKES BILLIONS a year can just charge whatever they want for a damn phone. Sure 500 is fine. But with a contract I want it for 200. Well guess what?! No contract. So. I'll go with the Iphone. The cheaper, more established one. (oh btw, did I mention you can actually use the touch screen on that one?)
- The iPhone 3GS is not cheaper, and unsubsidized will run you $500 as well.
- Google market cap= $191 billion, Apple market cap= $190.9 billion
- Correct the iPhone can use multi-touch and Android devices (in America) cannot, but to base an expensive purchase on multi-touch and fanboyism is simply misinformed, especially given the hardware mismatch (Nexus One has better specs by a long shot).
I'll concede that that new tech need money for R&D, however the one thing that always shocks me is how (too many) people justify the outrageous purchase price of (too many) of these gadgets. I don't care if new phones can do everything except teach me how to make myself invisible, i would never pay $530 ie the cost of an old but usable car (for example) for a damn phone. Some people need their heads read, even when earning very good money i don't get brainwashed into parting with such money. Unbelievable, typical of today's dumbed down society. Guess what, my kids like gadgets, and nice ones too, but (forgive me for using one of my now oft-used and favourite sayings) they have brains like their dad (and aren't afraid to use them) and they would never be suckered into wasting money on such things.
Plus as it's Google we're talking about, i wonder if this phone will start phoning 'home' :p
You couldn't be more right creaky. But this stupidity is not just in the world of gadgets. There are people that sped the same amount of money or even more on a pair of jeans, and in 3 months or so will be out of fashion.
Some spend that kind of money on a bottle of booze that's gone in two days, others on some fancy dinner that's gonna be history in just a few hours.
The brainwashing runs deep, and everyone in the consumer heard will justify its purchase, everyone will "create" the need to have one.
Quote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKLOfm4itow&fmt=18
Plus as it's Google we're talking about, i wonder if this phone will start phoning 'home' :p
Originally posted by cyprusrom:Indeed. I just dislike wasting keyboard characters on such pointless human beings, and such people only ever bite back with false and incredulous quips such as "you're jealous". Such people either know they are so shallow or are too dumb that they can't even see it. Either way that's why i rarely waste breath on such things. A $530 phone prompted me to respond though. I'll shut up before i get pelted by old cheapy mobile phones :p (wouldn't want my beloved Motorola Razr v3 to be mixed up with the old phones)
You couldn't be more right creaky. But this stupidity is not just in the world of gadgets. There are people that sped the same amount of money or even more on a pair of jeans, and in 3 months or so will be out of fashion.
Some spend that kind of money on a bottle of booze that's gone in two days, others on some fancy dinner that's gonna be history in just a few hours.
Wel lit is what it is, so I'm through fussing about the outragous price. I just am curious as to hwy American Android phones can't have multi-touch? Is it because of some stupid patent issue with Apple or what?
pssht, creaky, i bet yours rzrV3 cost about £400 on launch aswell :P
im sad to say i spent about £250 on my palm pre, and that was second hand, but IMO to me the cost was worth it. its like a laptop for me (portable email/web) without the bulk :)
Naw, i got it when was worth all of £30, however i did get it for free last year. I just think there are sensible price limits for things, and a phone over say £100 is a joke. As i say i'll leave it there, i'm getting out before i get buried under 600 million old phones needlessly destined for landfill
Originally posted by ddp:That is why a price of $299 would be more than fair, and create a very hefty profit.
don't forget all the engineering time, prototypes, research, programers times & manufacturing of molds for the phone has to be recuped from that remaining money. it is like buying a model warship kit that costs between $30 to $300 dollars. the plastic maybe cost $2 but have to factor in the cad designs, research & mold manufacturing. depending on how complex a mold is & what metal it is made from determines the price of mold from $100k to over a $1 million each.
This is why these iSupply reports (for many products) are bad...
1) They're still simply ESTIMATES of PARTS ALONE (no labor, packaging, shipping, R&D, marketing, etc. costs)
2) WAY too many people don't even seem to have the mental capacity to understand #1
i dont see the point in having a new smart phone.I own a nokia 6070 that was given to me as a gift nearly 3 years ago and it works fine.I consider a phone something to ring people and talk to people nothing more.if i wanted to post on facebook while im walking around or use the internet on the go i'd buy a cheap laptop for $400 and that would work far better than a mobile phone.I dont know all the features these new phones have but like i pointed out a phone is to ring people.
@creaky my mum uses a motorola razr V3 and it works fine.
Originally posted by xboxdvl2:than you are not the market ;)
i dont see the point in having a new smart phone.I own a nokia 6070 that was given to me as a gift nearly 3 years ago and it works fine.I consider a phone something to ring people and talk to people nothing more.if i wanted to post on facebook while im walking around or use the internet on the go i'd buy a cheap laptop for $400 and that would work far better than a mobile phone.I dont know all the features these new phones have but like i pointed out a phone is to ring people.
@creaky my mum uses a motorola razr V3 and it works fine.
Originally posted by xnonsuchx:Which is why $299 would be a great price to make a very hefty profit. Pricing 3x above parts is ridiculous. Look at the Samsung Omnia, it can't cost more than $100, and likely closer to $50 and it is "valued" at $450. You're an idiot for defending cell phone pricing schemes.
This is why these iSupply reports (for many products) are bad...
1) They're still simply ESTIMATES of PARTS ALONE (no labor, packaging, shipping, R&D, marketing, etc. costs)
2) WAY too many people don't even seem to have the mental capacity to understand #1
people that ramble and complain incorrect facts and about how much better the iphone is dont deserve an android anyway. If they cant learn to read or make real arguments, there is no way they would know how to utilize the android os anyway. stick to the iphone, they limit your functionality so that even the very simple can use it. obviously some iphone fanboys on here seem very simple.
Originally posted by xboxdvl2:Your opinion doesn't count when you hit 60. Stop spewing ignorant "facts" about your personal tastes.
i dont see the point in having a new smart phone.I own a nokia 6070 that was given to me as a gift nearly 3 years ago and it works fine.I consider a phone something to ring people and talk to people nothing more.if i wanted to post on facebook while im walking around or use the internet on the go i'd buy a cheap laptop for $400 and that would work far better than a mobile phone.I dont know all the features these new phones have but like i pointed out a phone is to ring people.
@creaky my mum uses a motorola razr V3 and it works fine.
Originally posted by ddp:Indeed.
NeoandGeo, says who?
Originally posted by NeoandGeo:Actually it's your comments that are ignorant. I personally use a phone to call and text, but no more than that. Not because it's 'ignorant' as you call it, but because that's all i want and need from a phone. If you want to use a phone for more than that, good for you.
Your opinion doesn't count when you hit 60. Stop spewing ignorant "facts" about your personal tastes.
Quote:I think we know who fits into the original poster's #2 reason lolOriginally posted by xnonsuchx:Which is why $299 would be a great price to make a very hefty profit. Pricing 3x above parts is ridiculous. Look at the Samsung Omnia, it can't cost more than $100, and likely closer to $50 and it is "valued" at $450. You're an idiot for defending cell phone pricing schemes.
This is why these iSupply reports (for many products) are bad...
1) They're still simply ESTIMATES of PARTS ALONE (no labor, packaging, shipping, R&D, marketing, etc. costs)
2) WAY too many people don't even seem to have the mental capacity to understand #1