The RIAA subsequently targeted her children, who were aged 15 and 11 at the time. The RIAA would prefer to walk away from any case that it cannot win quietly than ever see a defendant exonerated of the alleged crime.
Source:
Ars Technica
I would to see this woman just "kill" the RIAA. Long live the "queen".
The Shoe Man
This is a great article we need plenty more of these.
It would seem that across the US, judges are becoming perturbed with the fact that the RIAA effortlessly files these suits and then tries to act like nothing happened when they're wrong, irrelevent, or otherwise; they tie up the courts with these cases without proper research on their targets. I don't think the courts would mind so much if the RIAA took more time in gathering information on their targets before slapping suits against people. As it is, I think the courts are finally beginning to perceive this as reckless abuse of legal power, and it would appear that the court system has finally had it.
If this trend continues, the RIAA may be facing it's first real opposition.
Oh I'm just waiting and drooling for the article where this woman absolutely hammers the RIAA. Wouldn't it be fantastic to see her get a nice big pile o'money. Say $750 for everytime she had to worry about what these morons were doing to her!
She needs to make some baseless criminal & civil allegations, and then claim outrageous financial damages. Then let the RIAA spend a few million DISproving their own guilt.