Verizon threatens Netflix with cease and desist letter

Haven't seen this over here in Finland yet. I think. Not a Netflix subscriber, so wouldn't know for sure. =) But it's certainly amusing to follow the development!

Quote:

---

Haven't seen this over here in Finland yet. I think. Not a Netflix subscriber

---

Originally posted by Mr-Movies:

---

Quote:

---

Haven't seen this over here in Finland yet. I think. Not a Netflix subscriber

---

Now that's funny why wouldn't you see it? :D Oh that's right you don't have the service.... LOL

This sounds just like Verizon, it's not our fault even though we charge the most for our services. You got to love them and that is why I don't use them. However all communications companies are poor these days in the US and this is a extortion trick by them to charge us more for the services we already pay too much for, you got to love it.

---

Well if it's not Verizon's fault, whose fault is it?

This the trouble these days; no one wants to take responsibility for anything.

One thing's for sure; it needs sorting out and quick. And NOT by people having to pay more for the service as Mr-Movies says we're already paying too much already.

I don't have Netflix; I'm thinking of getting it but I might wait a bit longer.

I'm currently with Amazon Prime and I've been watching some series including "Black Books" but now they want me to pay extra to watch it.

Maybe I won't subscribe to anything.

Originally posted by TekPete:

---

Well if it's not Verizon's fault, whose fault is it?

This the trouble these days; no one wants to take responsibility for anything.

One thing's for sure; it needs sorting out and quick. And NOT by people having to pay more for the service as Mr-Movies says we're already paying too much already.

I don't have Netflix; I'm thinking of getting it but I might wait a bit longer.

I'm currently with Amazon Prime and I've been watching some series including "Black Books" but now they want me to pay extra to watch it.

Maybe I won't subscribe to anything.

---

Netflix should not blame Verizon only,many IP's companies do the same things, so they can spread the FIO speed fiber optics cable speeds around so far for without have cost more to their operations and to upgrade their network to often.

All IP's companies will stop this practices,if only Washington will stop letting them merging each other to become to big to care.

Originally posted by dEwMe:

---

Originally posted by TekPete:

---

Well if it's not Verizon's fault, whose fault is it?

This the trouble these days; no one wants to take responsibility for anything.

One thing's for sure; it needs sorting out and quick. And NOT by people having to pay more for the service as Mr-Movies says we're already paying too much already.

I don't have Netflix; I'm thinking of getting it but I might wait a bit longer.

I'm currently with Amazon Prime and I've been watching some series including "Black Books" but now they want me to pay extra to watch it.

Maybe I won't subscribe to anything.

---

I have both...I and most I know have Amazon due to the free expedited shipping. IF they happen to have something worth watching then that's a bonus. I do the bulk of movie watching on Netflix and if I am going to pay for a movie there are a lot of options. I wouldn't put Amazon on the top of that list either.

In my area...any time I have had bandwidth issues with Netflix they were as bad if not worse for Amazon. My guess is if you get decent streaming over Amazon you should see the same with Netflix. Also they have a free trial too. Another thing I like is you can't seem to get a video capable device that doesn't have Netflix capability. Amazon is not the same.

Wow...When did I become a Netflix Fanboi?

---

When I am travelling, Netflix will stream when every other similar service fails or is choppy to the extent that it is unwatchable. Verizon is the worst ISP that I have ever dealt with and I have recently ended my service with them. They can send out all the C&D notices they want, but that is the bottom line.

Verizon, doesn't stand much of a chance. For those outside the US, the FTC, part of the federal government, takes a dim view on false advertising. They have the ability to fine Verizon but will not since they are too influential ($$$). Still it is obvious Verizon is breaking the law by false advertising and wish to hide that.

Originally posted by Dela:

---

Originally posted by Mr-Movies:

---

Quote:

---

Haven't seen this over here in Finland yet. I think. Not a Netflix subscriber

---

Now that's funny why wouldn't you see it? :D Oh that's right you don't have the service.... LOL

This sounds just like Verizon, it's not our fault even though we charge the most for our services. You got to love them and that is why I don't use them. However all communications companies are poor these days in the US and this is a extortion trick by them to charge us more for the services we already pay too much for, you got to love it.

---

He meant he didn't see Netflix identifying an ISP as a source of congestion problems etc. in Finland, subscriber or not, as Admin of AfterDawn and four other sites in Finland I'm sure he'd have seen it :P

---

Originally posted by Mr-Movies:

---

Quote:

---

Haven't seen this over here in Finland yet. I think. Not a Netflix subscriber

---

Now that's funny why wouldn't you see it? :D Oh that's right you don't have the service.... LOL

---

Originally posted by rbi149:

---

When I am travelling, Netflix will stream when every other similar service fails or is choppy to the extent that it is unwatchable. Verizon is the worst ISP that I have ever dealt with and I have recently ended my service with them. They can send out all the C&D notices they want, but that is the bottom line.

---

I knew what you really meant I just thought I'd pull your chain a little as I've done the same thing myself from time to time... And you're right Skype and mobile networks enter into this argument as well.

Have a great day Ketola ;P

The sun is shining, it's Saturday, and I don't have a Netflix subscription. No reason not to have a great day then. ;-)

Have a good one as well!

We are overlooking the real problem here and that is our FCC. Why are they such lame d-cks (insert appropriate letter here, I or u). The FCC is supposed to be the watchdogs over our internet yet all they seem to do is argue amongst themselves and never accomplish anything productive. I say disband these jerks, and find a militant ex chief of police or military general to oversee the net and give him some prosecution teeth to ENFORCE any regulations that are applicable. We need an FCC that's not afraid to p-ss of the rich guy providers that want more for giving paying customers less. My ISP is via Mediacom and they sell me premium cost access of "up to 50 Mbps" the key here is up to so that is anything within that range from 0 to 50. and it only costs me an additional $50.00 USD OVER the $19.00 access fee for "basic" cable.Sad state of affairs Ollie.

I would have to agree with jimmurray on this subject. While the ISPs are responsible, the FCC is supposed to regulate. If the ISP were actually providing to the consumer what is advertised, then it should not be an issue of streaming at whatever speed that is required. Who is supposed to regulate that, the FCC. In my house hold we have both cable and DSL connections (wife is diehard DSL supporter)and we are always comparing speed/bandwith. However, we both agree that we are not getting anywhere near what is advertised even if we switch channels on our routers. The FCC need to regulate ISPs correctly and fight for the consumer. Sock it to em' Netflix. Btw, this just my opinion, we all have them.

Originally posted by jimmurray:

---

We are overlooking the real problem here and that is our FCC. Why are they such lame d-cks (insert appropriate letter here, I or u). The FCC is supposed to be the watchdogs over our internet yet all they seem to do is argue amongst themselves and never accomplish anything productive. I say disband these jerks, and find a militant ex chief of police or military general to oversee the net and give him some prosecution teeth to ENFORCE any regulations that are applicable. We need an FCC that's not afraid to p-ss of the rich guy providers that want more for giving paying customers less. My ISP is via Mediacom and they sell me premium cost access of "up to 50 Mbps" the key here is up to so that is anything within that range from 0 to 50. and it only costs me an additional $50.00 USD OVER the $19.00 access fee for "basic" cable.Sad state of affairs Ollie.

---